Untold: The Daniel Morgan Murder Investigative, Unsolved

Hosted By: Peter Jukes

Untold: The Daniel Morgan Murder is a podcast about the unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan, a private investigator who was found dead in a pub car park in 1987. The case has been mired in controversy and corruption for decades, and the podcast explores the many twists and turns of the investigation.

Untold: The Daniel Morgan Murder Podcast Host:

Peter Jukes is a British journalist and author who has written extensively about the Daniel Morgan case. He is also the co-founder of the website The Forbidden Files, which has been investigating the case for many years.

Praise from Listeners*:

  • Thorough Research: Listeners appreciate the depth of research that goes into every episode.
  • Exclusive Interviews: Untold offers a unique perspective by featuring exclusive interviews with key figures involved in the case, including witnesses, investigators, and even individuals close to the criminal underworld, providing listeners with invaluable insights into the events surrounding the murder.
  • Impactful Narration: Peter Jukes’ compelling and emotive narration style adds an extra layer of intrigue, empathy, and emotional connection to the story, making it more than just a crime documentary but a moving human drama.
  • Social Relevance: Untold: The Daniel Morgan Murder addresses significant social and legal themes that continue to resonate with contemporary audiences, sparking discussions and reflections on the state of justice and accountability in society.

Criticisms from Listeners*:

  • Lack of New Information: Despite the extensive research, some critics have pointed out that the podcast doesn’t always present groundbreaking revelations or new evidence regarding the Daniel Morgan murder case. This has led some to feel that the podcast may not deliver on the promise of providing entirely fresh insights.
  • Bias and Subjectivity: As with any true-crime podcast, there may be accusations of bias or subjectivity in how the host presents the case. Some listeners argue that Peter Jukes may lean too heavily towards certain theories or perspectives, potentially influencing the narrative in favor of particular conclusions.
  • Repetitiveness: Due to the nature of investigative reporting, the podcast might revisit certain aspects of the case multiple times throughout the series. This repetition could be seen as unnecessary and tiresome for some listeners, especially if they are already familiar with the case’s background
  • Complex Narrative Structure: The podcast weaves together multiple threads, characters, and timelines, which has been challenging for some listeners to follow.

* The True Crime Connection teams aims to keep this as an unbiased search database. In order to do this, we curate what people love the most and the least about a podcast by analysing ApplePodcast reviews.

To hear about our personal favorites/feedback, check out our Instagram or TikTok.
To submit a change to this listing, click here.

Want to leave your own review for fellow true crime fans to find when they hit this page? Add it in the comments below!


Add Review

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Both show and individual episode descriptions for listings on the TCC website have been submitted directly from the podcast featured or found online. We do our best to make sure all information is accurate, however; if there are any corrections to be made, please let us know here.